Lorelei v Leia Hospitality, Dubai Design District – Leah Restaurant Ltd 2020 [DIFC] SCT 134 (18 May 2020)

BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

The Dubai International Financial Centre


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> The Dubai International Financial Centre >> Lorelei v Leia Hospitality, Dubai Design District – Leah Restaurant Ltd 2020 [DIFC] SCT 134 (18 May 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ae/cases/DIFC/2020/sct_134.html
Cite as: Lorelei v Leia Hospitality, Dubai Design District – Leah Restaurant Ltd 2020 [DIFC] SCT 134

[New search] [Help]


Lorelei v Leia Hospitality, Dubai Design District – Leah Restaurant Ltd 2020 [DIFC] SCT 134

May 18, 2020 SCT - JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS

Claim No. SCT 134/2020

THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS

Court

In the name of His Highness Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Ruler

Ruler
of Dubai

IN THE SMALL CLAIMS TRIBUNAL

Tribunal
OF DIFC COURTS
DIFC Courts

BEFORE SCT JUDGE
Judge
NASSIR AL NASSER

BETWEEN

LORELEI

Claimant

Claimant

and

LEIA HOSPITALITY, DUBAI DESIGN DISTRICT – LEAH RESTAURANT LTD

Defendant

Defendant


Hearing: 17 June 2020
Judgment: 18 June 2020

JUDGMENT OF SCT JUDGE NASSIR AL NASSER


UPONthis Claim being filed on 20 April 2020

AND UPONthe Claim being Amended on 29 April 2020

AND UPONthe Defendant filing

Filing
an Acknowledgment of Service
Service
indicating its intention to contest the jurisdiction
Jurisdiction
of the DIFC Courts
DIFC Courts
dated 5 May 2020

AND UPONa Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction
Hearing having been held before SCT Judge
Judge
Maha Al Mehairi on 17 May 2020, with the Claimant and the Defendant’s representative in attendance

AND UPONthe Jurisdiction Judgment of SCT Judge Maha Al Mehairi dated 18 May 2020 finding that the DIFC Courts have the jurisdiction to hear and determine this claim

AND UPONa Hearing having been held before SCT Judge Nassir Al Nasser on 17 June 2020, with the Claimant and the Defendant’s representative in attendance

AND UPONreading the submissions and evidence filed and recorded on the Court

Court
file

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Defendant shall pay the Claimant the sum of AED 12,000.

2. The Defendant shall pay the Claimant the Court fees in the sum of AED 367.50.


Issued by:
Nassir Al Nasser
SCT Judge
Date of issue: 18 May 2020
At: 11am

THE REASONS

The Parties

1. The Claimant is Lorelei (the “Claimant”), an individual filing a claim regarding his employment at the Defendant company.

2. The Defendant is Leia Hospitality, Dubai Design District – Leah Restaurant Ltd (the “Defendant”), a restaurant located in the DIFC

DIFC
, Dubai, UAE
UAE
.

Background and the Preceding History

3. The underlying dispute arises over the employment of the Claimant by the Defendant pursuant to an Employment Contract dated 10 February 2019 (the “Employment Contract”).

4. On 1 April 2020, the Defendant terminated the Claimant’s employment due to the global crisis of Covid-19. The Claimant was terminated without notice nor payment in lieu of notice, in addition to other deductions without the Claimant’s approval.

5. On 20 April 2020, the Claimant filed a claim in the DIFC Courts’ Small Claims Tribunal

Tribunal
(the “SCT”) claiming AED 12,000 which includes 1-month notice period, payment in lieu of notice, end of service
Service
gratuity, annual leave in lieu and an annual flight ticket.

6. The Defendant responded on to the Amended Claim on 28 May 2020 and 17 June 2020.

Discussion

7. At the hearing, the Claimant argued that as per his Employment Contract he is entitled to the sum of AED 12,000 which consists of the following:

(a) One-month notice period in the sum of AED 6,000;

(b) End of service gratuity in the sum of AED 2,800;

(c) Annual leave accrued but untaken in the sum of AED 1,400; and

(d) Annual flight ticket in the sum of AED 1,800.

8. The Defendant did not contest the Claimant’s entitlements as per the Employment Contract but argued that due to the Pandemic of Covid-19 which has affected the business and the financial position of the Defendant they are unable to pay the Claimant his notice period.

9. However, the Defendant agreed to pay the Claimant his end of service gratuity, accrued annual leave and an annual flight ticket.

Findings

10. I find that the Defendant partially settled the claim by offering the Claimant the sum of AED 6,000 which consists of payment for his end of service gratuity, accrued annual leave and an annual flight ticket.

11. In relation to payment in lieu of notice, the Employment Contract stipulates that:

“Pre-confirmation, either party (the company or the Employee) can terminate employment during the six months’ probation period at any time.

Post-confirmation, two months’ notice should the employee wish to resign, and one-month notice should employer wish to terminate the agreement…”

12. On 1 April 2020, the Defendant terminated the Claimant’s employment. Therefore, as per the Employment Contract, the Claimant is entitled to one-month notice in the sum of AED 6,000.

13. Although the Defendant argued that they are in financial difficulty due to the Covid-19 pandemic which had a negative impact on the business, I find that the Defendant is obliged to honor the agreed terms of the Employment Contract.

14. Therefore, I find that the Defendant shall pay the Claimant the sum of AED 12,000 plus the Court fees in the sum of AED 367.50.


Issued by:
Nassir Al Nasser
SCT Judge
Date of issue: 18 May 2020
At: 11am


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ae/cases/DIFC/2020/sct_134.html