Leighton v Laneyl House Hospitality. Luden Restaurant [2020] DIFC SCT 136 (01 July 2020)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

The Dubai International Financial Centre


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> The Dubai International Financial Centre >> Leighton v Laneyl House Hospitality. Luden Restaurant [2020] DIFC SCT 136 (01 July 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ae/cases/DIFC/2020/sct_136.html
Cite as: [2020] DIFC SCT 136

[New search] [Help]


Leighton v Laneyl House Hospitality. Luden Restaurant [2020] DIFC SCT 136

July 01, 2020 SCT - JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS

Claim No. SCT 136/2020

THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS

In the name of His Highness Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Ruler

of Dubai

IN THE SMALL CLAIMS TRIBUNAL

OF DIFC COURTS
DIFC Courts
The Court of First Instance (including any circuit or division), the Court of Appeal and Tribunals established in accordance Article 14(3) of the Court Law .

BEFORE SCT JUDGE
Judge
Chief Justice and any Judges appointed under Article 9 of the DIFC Courts Law 2004.
MAHA AL MEHAIRI

BETWEEN

LEIGHTON

Claimant

and

LANEYL HOUSE HOSPITALITY. LUDEN RESTAURANT

Defendant


Hearing: 22 June 2020
Judgment: 1 July 2020

JUDGMENT OF SCT JUDGE MAHA ALMEHAIRI


UPONthis Claim being filed on 20 April 2020

AND UPONa Consultation having been held before SCT Judge

Ayesha Bin Kalban on 2 June 2020 with the Claimant and the Defendant’s representative in attendance

AND UPONthe parties failing to reach a settlement

AND UPONa Hearing having been held before SCT Judge Maha Al Mehairi on 22 June 2020, with the Claimant and the Defendant’s representative in attendance

AND UPONreading the submissions and evidence filed and recorded on the Court

file

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Defendant shall pay the Claimant the sum of AED 14,932.74‬.

2. The Defendant shall pay the Claimant the Court fees in the sum of AED 367.50.


Issued by:
Maha Al Mehairi
SCT Judge
Date of Issue: 1 July 2020
At: 1pm

THE REASONS

The Parties

1. The Claimant is Leighton (the “Claimant”), an individual filing

a claim regarding her employment at the Defendant company.

2. The Defendant is Laneyl House Hospitality. Luden Restaurant (the “Defendant”), a restaurant located in the DIFC

, Dubai, UAE
UAE
The United Arab Emirates.
.

Background and the Preceding History

3. The underlying dispute arises over the employment of the Claimant by the Defendant pursuant to an employment contract dated 23 January 2019 (the “Employment Contract”).

4. On 15 April 2020, the Defendant terminated the Claimant’s employment due to the global crisis of Covid-19. The Claimant was terminated without notice nor payment in lieu of notice, in addition to other deductions without the Claimant’s approval.

5. On 20 April 2020, the Claimant filed a claim in the DIFC Courts

’ Small Claims Tribunal
Tribunal
Tribunal established by the Chief Justice of the DIFC Courts under Article 14(3) of the Court Law .
(the “SCT”) claiming AED 12,000 which includes payment in lieu of her one-month notice period, end of service
Service
Steps required by Rules of Courts to bring documents used in court proceedings to a person's attention.
gratuity, accrued but untaken leave days, and her annual flight ticket.

6. The Defendant responded on to the Claim on 28 May 2020 and 21 June 2020.

Discussion

7. At the hearing, the Claimant argued that as per her Employment Contract she is entitled to the sum of AED 12,000 which consists of the following:

(a) Payment in lieu of her one-month notice period in the sum of AED 6,200;

(b) End of service gratuity in the sum of AED 2,800;

(c) Payment in lieu of annual leave accrued but untaken in the sum of AED 1,200; and

(d) Annual flight ticket in the sum of AED 1,800.

8. The Defendant did not contest the Claimant’s entitlements as per the Employment Contract but argued that due to the pandemic of Covid-19 which has affected the business and the financial position of the Defendant, they are unable to pay the Claimant her notice period.

9. As per the Defendant’s records, the Claimant is entitled to end of service gratuity in the amount of AED 2,940, annual leave for 7 days in the amount of AED 1,330, and the flight ticket back to Ukraine in the amount of AED 2,000.

10. At the hearing, the Defendant agreed to pay the Claimant her end of service gratuity, accrued annual leave, and an annual flight ticket.

Findings

11. I find that the Claimant is entitled to her claims in accordance with the DIFC Employment Law, No. 2 of 2019 (the “Employment Law”). However, the parties’ calculations do not appear to be in accordance with the Employment Law. I note that the Claimant’s monthly salary is in the sum of AED 6,200, with the following breakdown;

(a) Basic salary: AED 4,200

(b) Accommodation allowance: AED 1,500

(c) Transportation: AED 500

12. The Employment Law identifies the ‘daily wage’ as an employee’s annual wage divided by two hundred and sixty (260). Therefore, in this case, AED 6,200 x 12 months / 260 days = AED 286.15 (daily wage)

Annual Leave

13. As per the Defendant’s records, the Claimant is entitled to 7 days’ annual leave, as such, 7 days x 286.15 daily wage = AED 2,003.05

Gratuity payment

14. I find that the Employment Contract is an unlimited term contract, therefore, the Claimant is entitled to her end of service gratuity until her last working day, which I have determined to be 15 April 2020. Article 66.2 of the Employment Law reads as follows:

“An Employee’s Gratuity Payment shall be calculated as follows:

(a) an amount equal to twenty one (21) days of the Employee’s Basic Wage for each year of the first five (5) years of service; and

(b) an amount equal to thirty (30) days of the Employee’s Basic Wage for each additional year of service”

15. The Claimant worked for the period from 10 February 2019 to 15 April 2020 which calculates to 1 year and 64 days (21 days / 12 months = 1.75 for each month) and 64 days (1.75 / 30 = 0.06 for each day x 64 = 3.84 days).

16. The gratuity shall be calculated as follows:

(a) AED 4,200 x 12 months / 260 days = AED 193.84 (daily rate)

(b) 21 days (first year) + 3.4 (64 days) = 24.4

(c) AED 193.84 x 24.4 days = AED 4,729.69

17. Therefore, I find that the Claimant is entitled to the sum of AED 4,729.69 as end of service gratuity.

Air Ticket

18. In relation to payment of the Air Ticket, the Employment Contract stipulates that:

“Air ticket entitlement: For every 1 year of service economy class ticket to Italy or similar destination will be provided by the company.”

19. The Claimant completed 1 year in February 2020, as such she is entitled to an air ticket back to her home country which is Ukraine in the amount of AED 2,000 as per the Defendant’s records.

Notice Period

20. In relation to payment in lieu of notice, the Employment Contract stipulates that:

“Pre-confirmation, either party (the company or the Employee) can terminate employment during the six months’ probation period at any time.

Post-confirmation, two months’ notice should the employee wish to resign, and one-month notice should employer wish to terminate the agreement…”

21. On 15 April 2020, the Defendant terminated the Claimant’s employment. Therefore, as per the Employment Contract, the Claimant is entitled to one-month notice in the sum of AED 6,200.

22. Although the Defendant argued that they are in financial difficulty due to the Covid-19 pandemic which had a negative impact on the business, I find that the Defendant is obliged to honour the agreed terms of the Employment Contract.

23. Therefore, I find that the Defendant shall pay the Claimant the sum of AED 14,932.74‬ as well as the Court fees in the sum of AED 367.50.


Issued by:
Maha Al Mehairi
SCT Judge
Date of Issue: 1 July 2020
At: 1pm


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ae/cases/DIFC/2020/sct_136.html