(1) White & Case (2) Barclays Bank PLC v Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty [2022] DIFC CFI 061 (07 July 2022)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

The Dubai International Financial Centre


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> The Dubai International Financial Centre >> (1) White & Case (2) Barclays Bank PLC v Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty [2022] DIFC CFI 061 (07 July 2022)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ae/cases/DIFC/2022/DCFI_061.html
Cite as: [2022] DIFC CFI 061, [2022] DIFC CFI 61

[New search] [Help]


CFI 061/2020 (1) White & Case (2) Barclays Bank PLC v Bavaguthu Raghuram Shetty

July 07, 2022 COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE - ORDERS

Claim No. CFI 061/2020

IN THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS

IN THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

BETWEEN

WHITE & CASE

Applicant

BARCLAYS BANK PLC

Claimant

and

BAVAGUTHU RAGHURAM SHETTY

Defendant


ORDER OF THE REGISTRAR NOUR HINEIDI


UPON reviewing the Applicant’s letter application dated 22 June 2022 requesting to see a copy of Schedule C (the“Schedule”) of the Order of Justice Wayne Martin dated 22 April 2021 (the“Application”)

AND UPON the Registry having circulated the Application to the Claimant and Defendant in CFI-061-2020 for comment on 27 June 2022

AND UPON the Claimant’s response to the Application dated 5 July 2022 that it has no objection on the Application but would like more information as to the identity of the parties which the Applicant is representing in order to understand the purpose of the Application and the proposed use of the material

AND UPON the Applicant’s reply dated 6 July 2022 that they cannot disclose the name of the parties due to confidentiality and privilege

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Application is dismissed on the basis that the Schedule is private and the Applicant has shown no compelling reason to compromise the privacy of the Schedule.

2. No order as to costs.

3. Liberty to apply.

Issued by:
Nour Hineidi
Registrar
Date of issue: 7 July 2022
At: 2pm


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ae/cases/DIFC/2022/DCFI_061.html